Rennison. Koromfe.pdf

(16695 KB) Pobierz
Koromfe
Strong linguistic and ecological pressures are gradually pushing Koromfe,
a local language spoken in the north of Burkina Faso, West Africa, towards
extinction. Spoken by, at the most, 10,000 people, Koromfe has defied
political and cultural domination by other local languages.
Few other researchers have studied Koromfe in such depth and this is the
first detailed linguistical analysis of its kind, consequently providing data
which sheds light on many previously unanswered questions concerning both
Koromfe and genetic and general linguistic issues. The information which
constitutes this De.scriptive Grammar is based on field work conducted by the
author. As a Gur or Voltaic language, the author shows how Koromfe shares
many phonological, lexical, morphologi<;al and syntactic affinities with other
such languages.
John R. Rennison
is currently Senior Lecturer in Linguistics at the Univer-
sity of Vienna. He has worked extensively on the theory of phonology and
morphology, and has worked on Koromfe for sixteen years.
Descriptive Grammars
Series Editor: Bernard Comrie
University of Southern California
ADVISORY BOARD
W.S. Allen, Cambridge University
J.T. Bendor Samuel, Summer Institute of Linguistics
D.C. Derbyshire, Summer Institute of Linguistics
R.M.W. Dixon, Australian National University
M.E. Krauss, University of Alaska
B. Krishnamurti, Osmania University
Y.
Lastra, National Autonomo,us University of Mexico
S.A. Wurm, Australian National University
ABKHAZ
B.G. Hewitt
KOBON
J. Davies
MANGARAYI
F. Merlan
TAMIL
R.E. Asher
WEST GREENLANDIC
M. Fortescue
JAPANESE
J. Hinds
RUMANIAN
G. Mallison
MODERN GREEK
B.D. Joseph and
I.
Philippaki-Warburton
AMELE
J. Roberts
BASQUE
M. Saltarelli
GULF ARABIC
Clive Holes
KANNADA
S.N. Sridhar
FINNISH
H. Sulkala and M. Karjalainen
CATALAN
Jose Ignacio Hualde
PUNJABI
Tej K. Bhatia
MAORI
Winifred Bauer
KOREAN
Ho-min Sohn
NDYUKA
George
L.
Huttar and
Mary
L.
Huttar
RAPANUI
Veronica Du Feu
NIGERIAN PIDGIN
Nicholas G. Faraclas
WARI'
Daniel L. Everett and
Barbara Kern
EVENKI
Igor Nedjalkov
KASHMIRI
Kashi Wali and Omkar N. Koul
MALTESE
Albert Borg and
Marie Azzopardi-Alexander
Editorial statement
Until quite recently, work on theoretical linguistics and work on language
description proceeded almost entirely in isolation from one another. Work on
theoretical linguistics, especially in syntax, concentrated primarily on
English, and its results were felt to be inapplicable to those interested in
describing other languages. Work on describing individual languages was
almost deliberately isolationist, with the development of a different frame-
lang~age
work and terminology for each language or language group, and no feeding
of the achievements of language description into linguistic theory. Within the
last few years, however, a major rapprochement has taken place between
theoretical and descriptive linguistics. In particular, the rise of language
typology and the study of language universals have produced a large number
of theoreticians who require accurate, well-formulated descriptive data from
a wide range of languages, and have shown descriptive linguists that they can
both derive benefit from and contribute to the development of linguistic
theory. Even within generative syntax, long the bastion of linguistic anglo-
centrism, there is an increased interest in the relation between syntactic
theory and a wide range of language types.
For a really fruitful interaction between theoretical and descriptive lin-
guistics, it is essential that descriptions of different languages should be
comparable. The
Questionnaire
of the present series (originally published as
Lingua,
vol. 42 (1977), no. 1) provides a framework for the description of a
language that is (a) sufficiently comprehensive to cover the major structures
of any language that are likely to be of theoretical interest; (b) sufficiently
explicit to make cross-language comparisons a feasible undertaking (in
particular, through the detailed numbering key); and (c) sufficiently flexible
to encompass the range of variety that is found in human language. The
volumes that were published in the predecessor to the present series, the
Lingua Descriptive Studies
(now available from Routledge), succeeded in
bridging the gap between theory and description: authors include both
theoreticians who are also interested in description and field workers with an
interest in theory.
Editorial statement
The aim of the Descriptive Grammars is thus to provide descriptions of a
wide range of languages according to the format set out in the
Questionnaire.
Each language will be covered in a single volume. The first priority of the
series is grammars of languages for which detailed descriptions are not at
present available. However, the series will also encompass descriptions of
better-known languages with the series framework providing more detailed
descriptions of such languages than are currently available (as with the
monographs on West Greenlandic and Kannada).
Bernard Comrie
iv
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin