Journal Of Historical Review Vol 2 Number 3.pdf

(8958 KB) Pobierz
The
Journal
of
Historical
Review
I
1
-Cremator Hours-
the Possible and
the Impossible
Justice and the
on-going
NS
Trials
plus
Lawrence of Arabia
(revised)
Unanswered Correspondence
Butz,
Brandon, Chaim
THIS ISSUE
Volume
Two, Number Three
The Journal of Historical Review is published quarterly by
the Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance,
California 90505. United States of America. Subscription prices
are as follows: One year, U.S.$20; two years, U.S.$35; three
the equivalent
in
foreign currency.
years, U.S.$50.00-or
Foreign subscribers should add U.S.$5 if paying with a remit-
tance drawn on a foreign bank. For domestic First Class deliv-
ery add $5 per year. For Overseas Air Mail add U.S.$12 per
year. Bulk subscription rates a r e available on request.
Appropriate manuscripts a r e welcomed by the Editor, but must
be accompanied by return postage.
Listed:
Library of Congress
British Library
Encyclopedia of Associe tions
Writers Market 1981
PTLA Catalog
ISSN: 0195-6752
Institute for Historical Review
P.O.
Box 1306, Torrance, California 90505, U.S.A.
Permission is hereby granted for reprints of any article con-
tained herein, providing that no changes or alterations are
made prior to off-printing, and also providing that the following
attribution appears with the article:
"Reprinted by permission of The Journal of Historical Review
Torrance, California 90505, United States of
P.O.
Box
1_306,
America. Subscription rate: U.S.$20.00 per year."
Two copies of each off-print should be submitted to the Editor
of The Journal of Historical Review.
CONTENTS
Unanswered Correspondence
Messrs. Butz, Brandon, Chaim
The Problem of Cremator Hours
and Incineration Time
Dr. Reinhard
K.
Buchner
West German Justice and so-called
National Socialist Violent Crimes
Dr. Jur. Wilhelm Staglich
The Enigma of Lawrence
Desmond Hansen
About the Contributors
THE
JOURNAL
OF
HISTORICAL REVIEW
A
Note
from
the
Editor
Well. what does one say on assuming the editorship of The
Journal of Historical Review? "Hello."
I
suppose.
I
know these are some pretty big boots to
f .
especially
nith
d
the riolent crossfire
and
all. But
the
fruits
of
Revisionism.
in
my
view,
are just too valuable to
take
lightly.
We can certainly use a more honest histoq: lea*
perhaps to
a more cause-and-effect-aware citizenry. These can make for a
far more sane and responsible leadership.
Sound decisions a r e not made with false, unscrutinized data.
And only the slavemaster prospers where but a single view is
heard.
But should a blasphemy be uttered to challenge that view, the
fellow who dared utter it is threatened with sacking.
They
say
nasty things about him in the papers and glare a t his associates
hoping that they don't become similarly obsessed.
Revisionists
go
into the teeth today of the heaviest slavery of
all-the slavery of thought.
In the arena of what is "acceptable," lies are often bought with
cowardice. Fear of facing the truth takes the sting out of
responsibility, sweeping the consequent penalties under the
rug-for a time.
But with the better part of the world now under the influence of
powerful interests who debase laws and slant texts, we're all
headed for the concentration camp.
Harry Elmer Barnes thought that one way out was to "bring
history into accord with the facts." We agree. And so in pursuit
of this worthy aim, allow me to introduce you to Drs. Reinhard
K.
Buchner and Wilhelm Staglich.
-Dr. Buchner is trained in physics and engineering and is
therefore well qualified to estimate what was physically
impossible: The cremation of "millions."
Dr. Staglich specializes
i
jurisprudence and served as a judge
n
in West Germany, that is, until he began publicizing his
contention that prejudice and coercion in the pursuit of justice
produce lies and injustice. He knows the truth about those
on-going "war-crimes" trials and I'm sure you'll find his
presentation enlightening.
So welcome, and good reading!
Thomas
J.
Marcellus
Unanswered Correspondence
LEWIS
BRANDON
&
ARTHUR R. BUTZ
Christopher Hitchens
New Statesman
10 Great Turnstile
London WCIV 7HJ England
Dear Christopher Hitchens:
26 August 1980
'-
If the
New Statesman
is not "part of Israel's media
chorus"
(NS
20 June 1980) then why is it that your paper
refused to print letters from three distinguished Revisionist
academics, after they were slandered in your tractate last
November?
Your distinguished editor felt that the views of these
academics, i.e. anti-Zionist and skeptical of the "Holo-
caust" group-fantasy, removed them from the arena of de-
bate. The Press Council is now deliberating on Page's cur-
ious views on freedom of dissent.
I really would appreciate your reactions, Chris, for it
seems to me that there is one part of the Zionist apparatus
which seeks to neutralize debate by touching tangentially
on the more sensitive issues, and then skating away again
before they can be thoroughly gone into. At a stroke, the
Zionists can claim to be "covering all aspects in free de-
bate" but yet simultaneously squelching any aspects of that
debate which go outside
their
parameters.
Hope to hear from you.
Sincerely
Lewis Brandon

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika:

Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin