Child Development - Chapter 09.pdf

(1268 KB) Pobierz
307673_ch_09.qxd pp5 2/26/03 11:33 AM Page 310
CHAPTER 9
Cognition:
Information
Processing
THE INFORMATION-PROCESSING
APPROACH
THE DEVELOPMENT OF ATTENTION
Sustaining Attention
Deploying Attention
Selective Attention
A TYPICAL D EVELOPMENT : Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MEMORY
Recognition Memory
Recall Memory
Autobiographical Memory
C ONTROVERSY : How Reliable Is Children’s Eyewitness
Testimony?
Brain Development and Memory
THE DEVELOPMENT OF
PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS
Components of Problem Solving
E XAMINING R ESEARCH M ETHODS : Using the Microgenetic
Approach to Study Children’s Problem-Solving
Strategies
R ESEARCH A PPLIED TO E DUCATION : Facilitating Transfer in
the Classroom
The Development of Scientific Thinking
The Executive Function
CHAPTER RECAP
Summary of Developmental Themes
Summary of Topics
1255078885.046.png 1255078885.057.png
307673_ch_09.qxd pp5 2/26/03 11:33 AM Page 311
Key Themes in Cognition
Nature/Nurture What roles do nature and nur-
ture play in cognitive development?
Continuity/Discontinuity Is cognitive develop-
ment continuous or discontinuous?
Sociocultural Influence How does the socio-
cultural context influence cognitive development?
Individual Differences How prominent are in-
dividual differences in cognitive development?
Child’s Active Role How does the child play an
active role in the process of cognitive develop-
ment?
Interaction Among Domains How does cog-
nitive development interact with development in
other domains?
T omorrow’s geography test is going to be really tough,” Nate lamented to his friend
‘‘
on the way home from school. “I should have paid more attention in class and kept
up with my assignments. Now I have to study so much!” Normally a good student, Nate
had been preoccupied with the success of his baseball team. Now there was a price to be
paid as he prepared for the next day’s test, and he was decidedly anxious about it. Nate
had made up one “trick” for remembering the states in the Southeast: he strung their
first letters to make the phrase “True aces forget no states” for Tennessee, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, respectively. And it helped him
to identify some of the states by tying their shapes to things he knew; for example,
Florida really did look as though it had a “panhandle.” But there was so much more to
remember! Maybe he could just repeat the capitals of the states over and over to himself.
One thing he knew for sure: next time he would not save all of his studying for the night
before the test.
N ate, as it turns out, had a pretty good understanding of his mental capabilities.
He knew that paying attention in class was helpful and that certain tech-
niques, such as rehearsal, mental imagery, and other “tricks,” could help him remem-
ber information. He also knew there were limits to what he could accomplish in the
few hours he had to prepare for his exam. In fact, many aspects of Nate’s own think-
ing—attention, memory, and even the fact that he could evaluate his thought capa-
bilities—have been topics of great interest to developmental psychologists. In this
chapter, we continue our examination of cognitive development, this time from an
important alternative viewpoint to the perspectives described in the chapter titled
“Cognition: Piaget and Vygotsky”: the information-processing perspective. First, we
will summarize the major features of this theoretical model. Then we will survey sev-
eral topics that have been studied extensively from the stance of information-
processing theory, including attention, memory, and problem solving.
The Information-Processing Approach
A s we saw in the chapter titled “Themes and Theories,” information-processing
theorists believe that human cognition is best understood as the management
of information through a system with limited space or resources. In the information-
processing approach, mental processing is usually broken down into several compo-
nents or levels of activity. For example, memory processes are often partitioned into
encoding, storage, and retrieval phases. Information is assumed to move forward
through the system, and each stage of processing takes some time (Massaro &
Cowan, 1993; Palmer & Kimchi, 1986).
Many traditional information-processing models are called multistore models
because they posit several mental structures through which information flows
multistore model Information-
processing model that describes a
sequence of mental structures
through which information flows.
311
1255078885.068.png 1255078885.079.png 1255078885.001.png 1255078885.002.png 1255078885.003.png
307673_ch_09.qxd pp5 2/26/03 11:33 AM Page 312
312
Chapter 9
Cognition: Information Processing
Executive control processes
Regulate attention
Maintain appropriate
memory processes
Initiate strategies for
problem solving
Evaluate potential
response
Short-term memory
Storage
Long-term memory
Feeds
into
Environmental
stimuli
(Input)
Sensory register
Holds limited amounts
of information, which is
later forgotten or moved
to long-term memory
Saves information
permanently, using
various cognitive
strategies
Attentio n
Stores information
briefly
Retrieval
Response
(Output)
Source: Adapted from Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968.
sequentially, much as data pass through a computer. One example of this type of
model is shown in Figure 9.1. Most multistore models distinguish between psycho-
logical structures and control processes. Psychological structures are analogous to the
hardware of a computer. The control processes are mental activities that move infor-
mation from one structure to another, much as software functions for the computer.
Suppose someone asks you to repeat a list of words, such as shoe, car, truck, hat,
coat, bus .Ifyou have paid attention to all of the words and, like an efficient computer,
“input” them into your cognitive system, processing will begin in the sensory
register. Information is held here for a fraction of a second in a form very close to
the original stimuli, in this case the audible sounds you experienced. Next, the words
may move to the memory stores . Wo r king memory (sometimes called short-term
memory ) holds information for no more than a couple of minutes. Many researchers
consider working memory to be a kind of work space in which various kinds of cog-
nitive tasks can be conducted. If you were to repeat the words over and over to your-
self—that is, rehearse them—you would be employing a control process to retain
information in working memory. You might also use the second memory store, long-
term memory, the repository of more enduring information, and notice that the
items belong to two categories, clothing and vehicles. The executive control oversees
this communication among the structures of the information-processing system. Fi-
nally, when you are asked to say the words aloud, your response system functions to
help you reproduce the sounds you heard moments earlier.
Other theorists in this field have advanced a limited-resource model of the cog-
nitive system that emphasizes a finite amount of available cognitive energy that can
be deployed in numerous ways, but only with certain tradeoffs. Limited-resource
models emphasize the allocation of energy for various cognitive activities rather than
the mental structures themselves. The basic assumption is that the pool of resources
available for processing, retaining, and reporting information is finite (Bjorklund &
Harnishfeger, 1990). In one such model, introduced in the chapter titled “Cognition:
Piaget and Vygotsky,” Robbie Case proposes an inverse relationship between the
amount of space available for operating on information and that available for stor-
age (Case, 1985; Case, Kurland, & Goldberg, 1982). Operations, as we have seen,
FIGURE 9.1
A Schematic Model of
Human Information
Processing
This highly simplified model
includes several cognitive
structures and processes that
many information-processing
theorists believe to be impor-
tant in cognitive development.
As the arrows indicate, infor-
mation often flows in several
directions between various
structures.The goal of informa-
tion-processing models is to
identify those structures and
processes that are at work
when a child responds to his
or her environment.
sensory register Memory
store that holds information for
very brief periods of time in a
form that closely resembles the
initial input.
working memory Short-term
memory store in which mental
operations such as rehearsal and
categorization take place.
1255078885.004.png
 
1255078885.005.png 1255078885.006.png 1255078885.007.png 1255078885.008.png 1255078885.009.png 1255078885.010.png 1255078885.011.png 1255078885.012.png 1255078885.013.png 1255078885.014.png 1255078885.015.png 1255078885.016.png 1255078885.017.png 1255078885.018.png 1255078885.019.png 1255078885.020.png
 
1255078885.021.png 1255078885.022.png 1255078885.023.png 1255078885.024.png
 
1255078885.025.png 1255078885.026.png 1255078885.027.png 1255078885.028.png 1255078885.029.png 1255078885.030.png
 
307673_ch_09.qxd pp5 2/26/03 11:33 AM Page 313
313
The Development of Attention
include processes such as identifying the stimuli and recognizing relationships
among them; storage refers to the retention of information for use at a later time. If a
substantial amount of mental effort is expended on operations, less space is available
for storage or retention.
In the simple memory experiment we just examined, the effort used to identify
the words and notice the categorical relationships among them will determine the
space left over for storing those words. If we are proficient at recognizing words and
their relationships, storage space will be available. If these tasks cost us substantial ef-
fort, however, our resources will be taxed and little will be left for the task of remem-
bering. Robert Kail’s research (1986, 1991a, 1991b) supports the idea that a central
component of cognitive development is an increase in processing speed with age. As
children grow older, they can mentally rotate images, name objects, or add numbers
more rapidly. More resources then become available for other cognitive tasks.
How do these two general information-processing frameworks, the multistore
model and the limited-resource model, account for cognitive development? Multi-
store models allow for two possibilities. Changes in cognition can stem from either
an increase in the size of the structures—the “hardware”—or increasing proficiency
in employing the “software,” or control processes. For example, the capacity of the
mental structure working memory may increase with age, or, as children grow older,
they may increase their tendency to rehearse items to keep information in working
memory or even push it into long-term memory. Limited-resource models suggest
that what changes during development is processing efficiency. As children become
more proficient in manipulating information, more internal space is freed up for
storage.
The Development of Attention
H ave you ever noticed that sometimes a teenager can spend hours absorbed in a
single activity, such as doing a jigsaw puzzle or playing a video game, whereas
a toddler seems to bound from activity to activity? Most of us have a sense that older
children are better able than younger ones to “pay attention” to a given task. Re-
searchers have documented how children’s attentional processes undergo recogniz-
able changes with development.
Attention has been conceptualized as a process that allows the individual to focus
on a selected aspect of the environment, often in preparation for learning or prob-
lem solving (Kahneman, 1973). Attention represents the first step in cognitive pro-
cessing and, as such, is a critical phase. Unless information enters the system in the
first place, there will be few opportunities to develop memory, concepts, or other
cognitive skills. Children with a poor capacity to attend will have difficulties in learn-
ing, the ramifications of which can be enormous, especially as they enter school. Re-
search evidence corroborates that children who have greater attention spans and
persistence in tasks at ages four to five years have higher intelligence scores and
school achievement by the time they get to second grade (Palisin, 1986). Even at three
months of age, infants who pay greater attention to stimuli have better recognition
memory for them (Adler, Gerhardstein, & Rovee-Collier, 1998).
Sustaining Attention
One of the most obvious developmental trends is the dramatic increase in the child’s
ability to sustain attention on some activity or set of stimuli. Holly Ruff and
Katharine Lawson (1990) observed one-, two-, and three-and-a-half-year-olds while
the children played with an array of six toys. They observed a steady increase with
age in the amount of attention directed to individual toys. On average, one-year-olds
showed focused attention for 3.33 seconds, two-year-olds for 5.36 seconds, and
three-and-a-half-year-olds for 8.17 seconds. Generally, at ages two and three, children
long-term memory Memory
that holds information for ex-
tended periods of time.
limited-resource model
Information-processing model
that emphasizes the allocation of
finite energy within the cognitive
system.
1255078885.031.png
 
1255078885.032.png 1255078885.033.png
307673_ch_09.qxd pp5 2/26/03 11:33 AM Page 314
314
Chapter 9
Cognition: Information Processing
show longer periods of attention to television and to toys they are playing with than
to highly structured tasks. Between ages three and five years, though, children show
growth in the ability to attend to tasks arranged by an adult (Ruff, Capozzoli, &
We issberg, 1998). The attention span continues to increase throughout the early
school years and adolescence and shows a particularly marked improvement around
age ten years (Milich, 1984; Yendovitskaya, 1971).
Why does sustained attention increase with age? Maturation of the central ner-
vous system is partly responsible. The reticular activating system, the portion of the
lower brainstem that regulates levels of arousal, is not fully mature until adolescence.
Another factor may be the increasing complexity of the child’s interests. Young chil-
dren seem to be intrigued by the physical properties of objects, but because these are
often not too complex, simply looking at or touching objects quickly leads to habitu-
ation. On the other hand, older children are more concerned with creative and var-
ied ways of playing with objects (Ruff & Lawson, 1990). As children actively generate
more possible uses for stimuli, their active engagement with stimuli captivates and
feeds back to influence attention.
KEY THEME
Interaction Among Domains
KEY THEME
Child’s Active Role
Deploying Attention
A second developmental change in attentional processes involves the ability of chil-
dren to control their attention in a systematic manner; that is, they increasingly de-
ploy their attention effectively, such as when they are comparing two stimuli. At
three-and-a-half months of age, shifts of attention from one stimulus to another ap-
pear to be reflexive in nature, but by five to six months of age, they are more deliber-
ate and planned. Changes in the electrical activity of the cortex accompany this
changeover to more controlled attention (Richards, 2000). During the period from
about five to seven months, infants also exhibit a marked increase in the rate with
which they shift attention from one stimulus to another. More rapid shifts probably
reflect the infant’s greater efficiency in processing information from the environ-
ment. Researchers hypothesize that the infant’s ability to inhibit processing of one
stimulus so that the next one can be attended to underlies more rapid shifts (Rose,
Feldman, & Jankowski, 2001a).
The classic studies of Eliane Vurpillot (Vurpillot, 1968; Vurpillot & Ball, 1979) il-
lustrate developmental changes in how older children control their attention. Chil-
dren were shown a picture of two houses, each having six windows, and were asked
to judge whether the houses were identical (see Figure 9.2). As they inspected the
houses, their eye movements were filmed. Preschoolers scanned the windows less
thoroughly and systematically than older children. For example, when the houses
were identical, four- and five-year-olds looked at only about half of the windows
FIGURE 9.2
Comparing Houses
Children were asked to explore
houses to make judgments
about whether they were the
same or different while a
camera photographed their
eye movements. Preschoolers
explored the windows less
thoroughly, efficiently, and sys-
tematically than older children.
Source: Adapted from Vurpillot, 1968
1255078885.034.png 1255078885.035.png 1255078885.036.png 1255078885.037.png 1255078885.038.png 1255078885.039.png 1255078885.040.png 1255078885.041.png 1255078885.042.png 1255078885.043.png 1255078885.044.png 1255078885.045.png 1255078885.047.png 1255078885.048.png 1255078885.049.png 1255078885.050.png 1255078885.051.png 1255078885.052.png 1255078885.053.png 1255078885.054.png 1255078885.055.png 1255078885.056.png 1255078885.058.png 1255078885.059.png 1255078885.060.png 1255078885.061.png 1255078885.062.png 1255078885.063.png 1255078885.064.png 1255078885.065.png 1255078885.066.png 1255078885.067.png 1255078885.069.png 1255078885.070.png 1255078885.071.png 1255078885.072.png 1255078885.073.png 1255078885.074.png 1255078885.075.png 1255078885.076.png 1255078885.077.png 1255078885.078.png 1255078885.080.png 1255078885.081.png 1255078885.082.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin